The Role of Christ in Transhumanism
Jesus led by serving, and he invited his followers to do the same: to give themselves in service and sacrifice. That impulse, to reach for the highest virtues we can imagine and to grow toward godliness, sits remarkably close to the transhumanist hope of rising above our limitations.
Jesus exemplified servant leadership: the greatest among us as the servant of all. Whatever powers humanity gains, this remains the pattern—capacity in the service of compassion.
I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.
Jesus Christ as Savior and Redeemer
Jesus Christ is the central figure in Christianity. He is revered not only for what he taught, but also for his role in saving humanity and in helping us to achieve the full measure of our potential as children of God. Christians, including Mormons, believe that Jesus was more than just a great moral teacher; he was the son of God, and savior and redeemer of humanity. He is the savior and redeemer because he saves humanity from death and sin so that we can join God in perfect, maximal unity. To find ourselves in a position to one day be fully unified with God is a gift of grace.
The Title ‘Christ’ and His Invitation
“Christ” is an honorific title, not a surname. It means the anointed—someone set apart for a special purpose. We use it because we recognize Jesus as someone set apart with a special purpose: to overcome all obstacles that stand between humanity and God. Mormon ritual also includes an anointing, a process whereby faithful participants are explicitly reminded of their potential to progressively become like God.

That is what He did during His mortal life; it is what He would be doing if He were living among us today; and it is what we should be doing as His disciples and members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. As we emulate His perfect example, our hands can become His hands; our eyes, His eyes; our heart, His heart.
Jesus invited his followers to take on the name Christ—his title and his role. Christian disciples set themselves apart for the purpose of participating in Christ’s work and mission. We do this as we work together to overcome obstacles that stand between humanity and God. This may be as simple as befriending a neighbor, learning CPR, or saying “I’m sorry.” It may also include improving treatments for diseases, expanding our moral vision, or ethically extending technological or biological abilities to alleviate suffering, increase sustainability, and extend life. These are all central aims of transhumanism.
Participatory Atonement
In Jacob's allegory of the olive trees, the servants are not spectators to the redemption of the vineyard—they graft, dig, and prune, and “the Lord of the vineyard labored also with them” (Jacob 5:72). The atonement, on this reading, is shared labor.
Mormon theology does not treat the atonement as a transaction that Christ performs on us while we watch. It treats the atonement as a work that Christ invites us into. Joseph Smith taught that the Saints are to become “saviors on Mount Zion” (Obadiah 1:21; D&C 103:9–10)—that the work of redemption extends through us to our ancestors and our descendants. Christ’s atonement is the archetype for our own participation, not a substitute for it. Mormon scripture is unusually direct about where this participation leads: Doctrine and Covenants 76 describes the exalted as those who “are gods, even the sons of God.”
Why read the atonement this way, rather than as a finished transaction? The reasons run deep in both the word and the doctrine. The English word atonement was coined by William Tyndale to signify the process of bringing humanity back into a state of oneness—at-one-ment—with God. Oneness is a relationship, and a relationship cannot be completed unilaterally; it requires the willing participation of everyone reconciled. Christian theologians have proposed many accounts of how Christ’s sacrifice saves—ransom paid to liberate captive humanity, substitution satisfying the demands of justice, moral influence drawing us to follow his example—and Mormon teachings share aspects of each. But Mormon scripture pointedly limits the purely substitutionary reading: the prophet Amulek taught that the law will not allow one person to be sacrificed for the sins of another, which is why the atonement must be “an infinite and eternal sacrifice” (Alma 34:10) rather than a simple penal exchange. And the risen Christ describes his sacrifice in relational, persuasive terms—he was “lifted up upon the cross” that he might “draw all people” unto him (3 Nephi 27:14). An atonement that works by drawing rather than compelling (D&C 121:41–46) cannot finish its work until those who are drawn respond.
The doctrinal heart of the matter is Moses 1:39: God’s “work and glory” is “to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life” of humanity. That outcome cannot be achieved without the voluntary participation of God’s children—and to the extent it has not yet been fully achieved, the atonement is still an ongoing process, incomplete until humanity is fully reconciled with one another and with God in Christ. This is why scripture speaks of disciples not merely as beneficiaries of the atonement but as workers within it. Paul went so far as to rejoice that in his own flesh he was “completing what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church” (Colossians 1:24, NRSV). LDS practice institutionalizes the same conviction: members take Christ’s name upon themselves and extend salvation to others through humanitarian service, teaching, and vicarious work on behalf of the dead. For a fuller treatment, see the topical guide entry on atonement, including Ben Blair’s presentation “Come Follow Me: The Instrumental Atonement,” which argues that the atonement’s central purpose is to inspire us to follow Christ in taking responsibility for death and evil in the world and, with God’s help, working to overcome them.
This doctrine of participatory atonement is the bridge between Christology and transhumanism. When Mormon Transhumanists engage in longevity research, disease eradication, cognitive and moral enhancement, or the stewardship of creation, we understand these projects as concrete extensions of the work Christ began and invites us to continue: the overcoming of death and sin, the healing of bodies and communities, the consolation of the afflicted. We are not waiting for Christ to do the work alone. We are being invited to do it with him. Christ is not only our exemplar; he is our collaborator.
Grace and Works Together
Christians encountering transhumanism sometimes worry that it amounts to humanity trying to save itself—works without grace. Mormon theology offers a resolution: grace and works are not opposed but inseparable phases of the same atonement. As Mormon scripture puts it, “by grace we are saved, after all we can do” (2 Nephi 25:23). Grace is the gift of Christ’s invitation and the capacity to respond to it; works are our acceptance of and participation in that invitation.
Transhumanist projects, rightly pursued, are works in exactly this sense—not an attempt to earn salvation or to ascend autonomously without God, but an acceptance of an invitation already extended. Neither pure grace (passively waiting for divine intervention) nor pure works (autonomous human ascent) captures the Mormon Transhumanist position. Christ initiates and sustains; we participate and extend.
The Body of Christ and the Shape of Our Future
Hobbes pictured the commonwealth as a Leviathan: countless persons absorbed into one sovereign body. Paul's Body of Christ inverts the image—many members, distinct gifts, no member dispensable and no member dominant—and remains the explicit theological alternative to futures that concentrate power in a single being or system.
What kind of future does Christ invite us toward? Paul’s answer is the Body of Christ: many members, distinct gifts, united in love, with no member dispensable and no member dominant (1 Corinthians 12). This image matters enormously for transhumanism, because some voices in the broader movement imagine the future as a singular apex—a lone superintelligence or sovereign power that optimizes the world on humanity’s behalf. The Body of Christ is the explicit theological alternative: superhumanity that is constitutively plural, communal, and power-sharing. Many, united in love: that, and not domination, is the Christlike shape of the future. If the eye cannot say to the hand, “I have no need of thee,” neither can any superintelligence say it to the rest of humanity.
The Role of Christ in Transhumanism
The work of overcoming the obstacles between humanity and its full potential requires no confession of faith—only love expressed as labor. Whoever does it is, knowingly or not, participating in the work Christ exemplified.
As Christians and as transhumanists, we take Christ’s invitation seriously and avoid artificially limiting our role in that work. Transhumanism is the ethical use of science and technology to expand human abilities and minimize suffering. The role of Christ—the role he plays as savior and redeemer and the role he asks us to share with him—in transhumanism is to work toward the best, most ethical outcomes. In other words: to join God and help others do the same. This work did not end with Jesus, and will not end until all obstacles that stand between humanity and God are overcome.
But behold, that which is of God inviteth and enticeth to do good continually; wherefore, every thing which inviteth and enticeth to do good, and to love God, and to serve him, is inspired of God.
This includes practical work that anyone can do, whatever their creed: caring for the poor and needy, feeding the hungry, comforting the grieving, and visiting the sick and imprisoned. It includes researching cures for diseases, developing prosthetics and therapies that restore sight, hearing, and movement, making clean water and medicine available to those without them, teaching and mentoring, building institutions that deal justly, and stewarding the natural world for generations yet to come. None of these works requires a confession of faith—only love expressed as labor. The role of Christ, in other words, can be emulated not just by religious Christians but by non-Christians and even secular people; whoever works to overcome the obstacles that stand between humanity and its full potential is, knowingly or not, participating in the work Christ exemplified.

If anyone swear by Tash and keep their oath for the oath’s sake, it is by me that they have truly sworn, though they know it not, and it is I who reward them. And if anyone do a cruelty in my name, then, though they say the name Aslan, it is Tash whom they serve and by Tash their deed is accepted.
Questions for Discussion
- How do the aims of transhumanism overlap and align with the aims of Christ?
- What does it mean that Christ’s atonement is participatory? How does seeing Christ as collaborator, and not only exemplar, change the nature of discipleship?
- What are the benefits/dangers of assuming/neglecting responsibilities to take on the mission and role of Christ?
- How do you interpret John 14:12? What does it mean to “do even greater things” than Jesus did?
- How do grace and works relate in the pursuit of human exaltation? Where is the line between accepting a divine invitation and attempting autonomous ascent?
- Paul describes the Body of Christ as many members with no member dominant. What does this image imply about visions of the future that concentrate power in a single being or system?
- What does it mean to you to take on the name of Christ?
- Where do you draw the line between Jesus’s role in overcoming death and sin and our own role?
- How might one strive to emulate Christ in a non-religious sense?
