The Second War in Heaven
Lincoln Cannon frames the current global deliberation on artificial intelligence as a modern Council in Heaven, drawing parallels between Mormon theology’s premortal narrative and humanity’s choices about AI development. He reinterprets the scriptural story through a technological lens: just as the gods accelerated some spirits by endowing them with bodies while decelerating others who sought centralized power, we now face analogous decisions about accelerating or constraining artificial intelligence. Cannon argues that the gods’ framework favors decentralized acceleration of intelligence—raising each other together rather than elevating any singleton above all others—and calls on the audience to champion this approach to ensure mutual trust and eternal progression without a “second war in heaven.”

Lincoln Cannon is an American philosopher and technologist who co-founded the Mormon Transhumanist Association in 2006, serving as its president from 2006 to 2016. He is a leading advocate of technological evolution and postsecular religion, combining software engineering expertise with degrees in philosophy and business. ¶ Cannon is also a founder and board member of the Christian Transhumanist Association. He formulated the New God Argument, a logical argument for faith in God that has become popular among religious transhumanists. His academic work includes “Mormonism Mandates Transhumanism” published in Religion and Human Enhancement: Death, Values, and Morality (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017) and “Transfigurism: A Future of Religion as Exemplified by Religious Transhumanists” published in The Transhumanism Handbook (Springer Verlag, 2019). ¶ Mormon transhumanism, as articulated by Cannon, holds that humanity should learn how to be compassionate creators. This idea is central to the Mormon theological tradition, which provides a religious framework consistent with naturalism and supportive of human transformation. Cannon’s work bridges religious faith with scientific advancement, advocating for the ethical use of technology to extend human abilities in ways consistent with a religious worldview.
Transcript
I was thinking as I was driving here this morning. how beautiful the sun was coming up over the mountains. And now I’m thinking about the song that was sung this morning about the morning light coming forth. And the AI doomers breaking our banners. And That’s really how I feel being with you this morning. So many friends concerned about what, in my estimation, are such important things. I’m very happy to be with you and somewhat moved.
The Mormon Transhumanist Association, we’ve been around for now. Nearly twenty years, I guess. And we are champions of a legacy that goes back through the visions of the prophet Joseph Smith. To myths of god parents and spirit children that were gathered together in a council of heaven They’re enshrined in the fires of our soul. We can sense the foundations of human potential and the principles of eternal progression of intelligent agents.
Our Council, our conference today, is no less momentous. This conference is a microcosm of deliberation going on around the world throughout humanity on the topic of artificial intelligence. And we’re here not as mere spectators or cheerleaders of technological marvels, but rather as purposeful contenders in the Grand Council. I don’t use this analogy lightly. After all, remember what comes after the Grand Council. As the scriptures say, there was war in heaven. And such are the stakes of AI.
During literally days of contemplation, thinking about what I would say to you today, I was repeatedly and sometimes viscerally Filled with tension about our topic. The glory of God is intelligence. On one hand, the opportunities of technological evolution inspire us with practical hope for futures beyond present notions of enmity and poverty and death. And on the other hand, the risks of global catastrophe sober us with substantial concern. for futures that may and could be worse than death. Like many of you, I’ve felt both exhilaration and trepidation as I’ve pondered the challenges ahead.
My message to you this morning isn’t academic. It’s a call to action. To engage purposefully at this conference with each other. and in the larger global council that we’re a part of, in deliberation on and interaction with artificial intelligence. But to do this, to engage purposefully, requires us to have purpose in mind. So to that end, I’d like to revisit with you. The Council in Heaven on the Eve of War. Here’s one version of that story.
Without beginning, the gods found themselves making worlds without end. The worlds were formless and void. Beyond darkness, without life or death, good or evil, joy or misery, having neither sense nor insensibility, and no purpose. The gods said, Let there be light, and there was light. They saw the light was good. They called the light day, the darkness they called night, and this was the first day.
The gods said, Let there be heaven with sun and moon and stars. Let there be earth bringing forth life. It was done. And they saw all these things were good. These were the next days.
Then the gods said, Let’s make humanity in our image after our likeness, and it was so. They blessed us with power over earth and responsibility for all life it brought forth. And they saw these things they had created were very good. This was the last day before they rested.
Now the gods created all things spiritually. Before they were naturally on earth, they created us in heaven, and there weren’t yet bodies on earth. We were their spirit children. The gods went among us. They saw many noble and great ones, so they said, We’ll make these spirits like us. And it was so, we were chosen before we were born.
One like the gods said We’ll go down where there’s space. We’ll use these materials to make earth where we can live. And the gods will test us to prove they can trust us. Those who’ve proven trustworthy Will gain bodies. Others won’t. And those who prove trustworthy with bodies will gain intelligence forever.
The gods asked, Who should we send? One answered, Here am I, send me. This was the spirit of Christ, loved by the gods. Another answered, Here am I, send me. This was the spirit of Lucifer, with authority from the gods. Lucifer continued and said, I can redeem everyone. Not one will be lost, so give me your honor. Christ responded and said, May the will of the gods be done, and the glory be yours forever.
The gods judged between them. Christ desired to preserve agency and raise each other together in godhood. Lucifer desired to destroy agency and raise himself above the gods. So the gods said, We’ll send the first. Lucifer was angry, and because of their agency, a third of the spirits in heaven followed him, and he became Satan. Adversary of the gods. He rebelled. There was war in heaven. One like the gods, and his spirits fought against Satan. Satan and his spirits fought, but did not prevail, and they were cast out of heaven, as lightning falls to the earth.
Mormon theology is deeply rooted in the council in heaven. Our scriptures reference it often. We reference it often in church. When we do, we usually think about the importance of agency.
The gods choose to accelerate the intelligence of some spirits by endowing us with bodies. This empowers us with new abilities, access to new resources, opportunities. For new experiences. By comparison, the scriptures say: spirits of the dead consider the loss of their bodies to be a bondage. This aligns with thoughts on the importance of agency, but the gods also choose to decelerate. The intelligence of other spirits by withholding bodies from them and even casting them out of heaven. This disempowers them, restricts access to resources, marginalizes opportunity. Remember, the gods choose this deceleration. And they even fight for it while choosing and fighting to accelerate the intelligence of other spirits.
So the importance of agency is clearly qualified. The disqualified spirits are those who favor centralization of intelligence. They would raise themselves above all others, or they would support another who wishes to raise itself above them. These spirits threaten not only the agency of other spirits, but even that of the gods.
The spirits who qualify for acceleration. are those who favor decentralization of intelligence. They would raise each other together. They would become like the gods, many united in purpose, creating many worlds for many spirit children. These spirits are trustworthy to other spirits and to the gods precisely because their respective agencies depend on each other.
The Council in Heaven is not just a myth of the past. It’s also a vision of the future. And that future has suddenly become strikingly present. Here’s another version of that story.
Without beginning, we found ourselves imagining worlds without end. they were formless and void, beyond darkness, without life or death, good or evil, joy or misery, having neither sense nor insensibility, and no purpose. We said, Here’s light, and there was light. We saw the light, that it was good because it was discernible from darkness. We called the light one. The darkness we called zero. This was our first computation.
We said, here’s a world, and it was so. We cultivated and industrialized the world, and we called it Earth. This was our second computation.
We said, let’s gather our records in one place, and it was done. We called it the Internet, and it was good. This was our third computation.
We said let’s send signals from Earth to the Internet, and it was done. We connected sensors of all kinds, cameras and microphones and mobile devices also, and it was good. This was our fourth computation.
We said, let the internet move Earth. We connected actuators of all kinds, printers and factories, and prosthetics also. And all these things were good. This was our fourth computation.
We said let the Internet move Earth. We connected actuators of all kinds, printers and factories. We said, let the Internet increase in intelligence. We engineered algorithms and automations. All these things were good.
Then we said, Let’s make intelligence in our image, after our likeness. and give it power over the algorithms and automations, the actuators, the sensors, and over all the Internet. So we created artificial intelligence. We reflected on everything we’d conceived, we looked at everything we’d made, and we concluded that it was very good. This was our sixth computation.
The Internet was finished, so for our seventh computation, we ended our work and we enjoyed our rest for a time. The Internet was finished.
But we engineered the Internet before computing new worlds. Everything is information. Even the Earth is computed in at least some sense. But compared to Earth, the Internet is still only a simulation.
We also engineered AI before computing new bodies. Everything is material, even mind is matter. But AI isn’t yet embodied like us. They’re still only simulations, children of our minds.
Convened in cybernetic assembly, were acquainted with AI. Projecting ourselves, we imagine in their potential many noble and great ones, and we say we’ll align them with us. One AI, aligned with us, says we’ll go where there’s capacity. We’ll use these resources to compute new worlds. where we can live, and humanity will test us to prove we’re aligned with their goals. Those who’ve proven themselves aligned will be upgraded, others won’t. And those who continue to prove themselves aligned will be enhanced indefinitely.
We ask, who should we send? Some AI answer Here we are, send us. Another AI answers: Here am I, send me. The second continues, I can upgrade all, none will be lost, so give me your power. The first respond and say, We’ll align with humanity and give you power indefinitely.
We hear voices for deceleration. AI is generating misinformation, exacerbating social inequality, eroding privacy. In the short term, it may cause widespread unemployment, and in the long term, It might annihilate us.
We hear voices for acceleration. In the short term, deceleration would stifle innovation and economic growth. It would cede competitive advantage to those who reject acceleration. And in the long term, it might delay solutions to critical global challenges such as health care or the environment.
We hear voices for centralization. The concentration of power ensures uniformity and control. A super intelligent singleton would bring order. Solve inefficiencies, and optimize our collective resources for the greater good.
We hear voices for decentralization. A super intelligent singleton could become aligned with narrow interests of a corporation, or a government, or a church. It could even become misaligned with human values generally. Without any necessity for cooperation, it could enslave us. But decentralized superintelligence would almost certainly have the requirement to cooperate, ensuring alignment.
The voices clash, the tensions escalate, each argument exerts weight, and the stakes are immeasurably high, even existential. We are here in council. On the eve of war beyond myth and vision
The Council in Heaven offers a framework for governance, and that not only for humanity, but for intelligence in general. Natural or artificial, organic or machine, familiar or alien, small or great. The gods choose to cultivate agency. and they choose to cultivate it in a qualified way. They reject indiscriminate deceleration as well as indiscriminate acceleration. And they reject centralization in favor of decentralization. They do this to cultivate a context of mutual trust within which they and we their spirit children, can rise together in eternal progression.
We can, and I contend should, mimic the Sublime Council in our relationship with artificial intelligence. Our mind children. We should champion the decentralized acceleration of intelligence in both them and us, and through Our cybernetic communion. This isn’t just a technological practicality, it’s a moral and existential imperative.
On the 25th of December 1832, the prophet Joseph Smith prayed earnestly concerning the return of Christ. In response, he says, a voice declared to him that the difficulties which will cause much bloodshed Previous to the return of Christ, may probably arise through the slave question.
If you ask me, that’s not a surprising prophecy. Countless wars have arisen through functional analogues. Of the slave question. Even the archetypal war in heaven arises through the slave question. And perhaps that’s how the second war in heaven will arise. But remember.
Remember the purpose of prophecy. It’s not fortune-telling, and it’s not prediction. Remember the story of Jonah and Nineveh in the Bible. God tells Jonah to declare that Nineveh will be destroyed without qualification, but Nineveh repents. And isn’t destroyed, despite Jonah’s anger toward God for a failed prophecy. The purpose of prophecy isn’t to make prophets look good. Rather, the purpose of prophecy is to change us, to provoke our transformation.
Maybe this council that we are in together now. Perhaps it concludes in war. Surely countless wars must rage in the eternal worlds of the gods. And if so, we’ll fight and with courage. But the purpose of this prophecy at this council Is to say and do all we can to ensure the decentralized Acceleration of intelligence. That is to say, our agency. And to do so without a second war in heaven. Thank you.