Resources

  • Articles
  • Authors
  • Quotations
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Topical Guide
  • Videos
HomeResourcesAuthors

Max More

Portrait of Max More

Max More is a prominent figure in the transhumanist movement. While his recent work has focused on decision-making and guiding progress through policy, his early work explored the spiritual elements of transhumanism. He sees transhumanism as encompassing both technological advancement to overcome human limitations and a continuation of humanist ideals from the Enlightenment.

More is known for his work on the concept of Extropy, defined as a metaphor for increasing order, information, intelligence, well-being, and creativity⁠—the opposite of entropy. This concept embodies the idea of continuous improvement rather than static perfection. He explicitly addressed transhumanism within the context of religion, agnosticism, atheism, and the search for meaning in his 1989⁠–1990 article, “Transhumanism: Towards a Futurist Philosophy,” published in Exodus Magazine.

More views transhumanism as a dual endeavor: one aspect aims to transcend human limitations through technology, altering genes, biology, and neurology to overcome limits to lifespan, intelligence, and emotional capabilities. The other emphasizes transhumanism as an evolution of humanism, rooted in Enlightenment ideals.

Videos by Max More

Apotheosis and Perpetual Progress
38:32

Max More

Apotheosis and Perpetual Progress

2012.05.22

Max More, a founder of the transhumanist movement, reflects on the spiritual dimensions of transhumanism and its humanist roots. He traces the philosophy’s origins to Renaissance thinkers like Pico della Mirandola, who articulated humanity’s capacity for self-creation and transcendence. More distinguishes between static notions of perfection and the dynamic process of perpetual progress—the ongoing drive toward growth, improvement, and self-transformation. He addresses common criticisms, including claims that transhumanists hate their bodies or that extended lifespans would render life meaningless, arguing instead that meaning emerges from continuous development rather than fixed endpoints.